https://bit.ly/3QhYI0u
https://bit.ly/3RCYhip
https://bit.ly/3RBuWVE
https://bit.ly/3RhdDZX
https://bit.ly/3qj7uR7
https://bit.ly/3qj7wsd
https://bit.ly/3ecX5DR
https://bit.ly/3KKZtOB

Although speaking of PUAs, there was an episode of Castle that was right out of The Game. The best part was when the hot female detective, upon realizing to her horror how many moderately attractive women had been successfully seduced by a dead PUA, shook her head and said: “I weep for my gender.” Okay, zero points for proper use of the English language, but hilarious anyway.

Interestingly enough, I rarely (if ever) get approached by visibly high-T/”bigger” men, so I think that there’s some sort of mutual disinterest/LJBF happening there.

This is a cogent observation. I have noticed that adult women who prefer the hipster men are either still attracted to the same type of juvenile men that first attracted them in their early teens, or tend to fall in the 5-6 SMV category. My hypothesis is that the human mind has an unconscious means of limiting its attraction triggers to the members of the opposite sex within an attainable SMV range. It was always astounding to me when a relatively plain woman would confess that she found one of my average male friends to be hot while genuinely exhibiting no interest whatsoever in any of my much better-looking friends. It’s a very healthy and positive spin on the sour grapes fable.

127Sai October 26, 2012 at 6:24 am
@VD
“My hypothesis is that the human mind has an unconscious means of limiting its attraction triggers to the members of the opposite sex within an attainable SMV range. It was always astounding to me when a relatively plain woman would confess that she found one of my average male friends to be hot while genuinely exhibiting no interest whatsoever in any of my much better-looking friends.”
I like this hypothesis. What could this mean for the brains of, say, 4s who chase 9s? Well, besides the promiscuity being hard-wired thing.

(The more I look at Mr. H up there the more I think of Metalocalypse.)

128pvw October 26, 2012 at 7:21 am
@BB: From my limited understanding of changing campus social mores: having sex primarily for recreational or conquer-the-world purposes is essentially ok…If she has sex as part of a deal to secure a relationship with an eligible man, however, she is guilty of all manner of crimes. Someone who just abstains completely must be “repressed” or “neurotic” or “provincial.” The intention really does seem to be to establish that gender-related sexuality differences are just a social construct, and to “prove it” by linking N and self-esteem in a way that was usually associated with fraternities and male jocks.

Me: That last sentence explains it exactly!