https://bit.ly/3EQzpk4
https://bit.ly/3Tx7pWD
https://bit.ly/3MHwMD0
https://bit.ly/3D7N0lQ
https://bit.ly/3MN8VSC
https://bit.ly/3MHmp2b
https://bit.ly/3CNQZm0
https://bit.ly/3ePrclr
That’s why Susan Walsh on this blog focuses on changing women’s minds about the desireability of casual sex for their long term LTR with commitment and marriage market success. Secondarily she tries to encourage beta guys to learn some game and get some emotional and sexual attractiveness mojo going, so that guys who might be more commitment minded are available for good looking girls to chose instead of sex with alphas on their, causal sex, terms.
Susan Walsh says:
May 7, 2011 at 7:40 pm
@Doug1
You have summed up my mission here better than anyone, including myself. I think I will need to change my Mission Statement to reflect your comment.
Abbot says:
May 7, 2011 at 8:32 pm
This whole double standard and slut shaming claims and insecurity claims and hypocritical claims nonsense are attempts to discredit a type of thinking and action. But those doing it never seem to admit what they are up to or its kept vague. Not too long ago there was some study done suggesting that hookups can lead to relationships at about the same rate as non hookup meets. Not a story remarkable enough to have a following. Oh, my my but the feminist just jumped all over it. Could not figure out why at first. But its now clear. Although the feminists never admitted it was about the men accepting the women despite it being a hookup, they just stated that both men and women accept it and so there is nothing wrong with starting a relationship with a hookup. But it is really about the man, and that is why support for that study shows that these feminists are VERY concerned that men will accommodate a woman who wants sex just to leave her if she wants more from him because she had sex right away. The feminists seem so desperate to get women to believe that men do not care and perversely are trying to get men to accept that it makes no difference how a woman behaves sexually.
.
I will never believe its about slut shaming. Its it is about women becoming
dis-empowered because of their empowerment activities. That is, they are being pushed back as they attempt to cap off years of casual sex with a marriage
Jess says:
May 7, 2011 at 9:07 pm
Well,
He can’t be that rare cos all my experienced friends are married with bambinos
Jess says:
May 7, 2011 at 9:26 pm
nicely written longer post to Tom. Some good points throughout and good to see debate with out insult.
From talking to younger friends and colleagues about this it maybe true that some men are not to keen on super sluts or virgins but they feel number is lower down on the checklist.
Ie a 7 girl with 15 exes is more attractive than a 4 girl with 2 exes.
Then of course you have chemistry and religion and status etc etc
Number, right or wrong, maybe a factor, but isn’t of nuclear importance.
I know it means a lot to some guys here and no doubt they are not alone but i have found little evidence
{"html5":"htmlmixed","css":"css","javascript":"javascript","php":"php","python":"python","ruby":"ruby","lua":"text\/x-lua","bash":"text\/x-sh","go":"go","c":"text\/x-csrc","cpp":"text\/x-c++src","diff":"diff","latex":"stex","sql":"sql","xml":"xml","apl":"apl","asterisk":"asterisk","c_loadrunner":"text\/x-csrc","c_mac":"text\/x-csrc","coffeescript":"text\/x-coffeescript","csharp":"text\/x-csharp","d":"d","ecmascript":"javascript","erlang":"erlang","groovy":"text\/x-groovy","haskell":"text\/x-haskell","haxe":"text\/x-haxe","html4strict":"htmlmixed","java":"text\/x-java","java5":"text\/x-java","jquery":"javascript","mirc":"mirc","mysql":"sql","ocaml":"text\/x-ocaml","pascal":"text\/x-pascal","perl":"perl","perl6":"perl","plsql":"sql","properties":"text\/x-properties","q":"text\/x-q","scala":"scala","scheme":"text\/x-scheme","tcl":"text\/x-tcl","vb":"text\/x-vb","verilog":"text\/x-verilog","yaml":"text\/x-yaml","z80":"text\/x-z80"}